Τὸ παρὸν νέο ἱστολόγιο εἶναι ἡ συνέχεια τοῦ παλαιοῦ μὲ τὸ ὁποῖο συνδέεσθε μέσῳ τῆς διευθύνσεως http://endiameseperioche.blogspot.gr

Τὰ ἄρθρα τοῦ παρόντος ἱστολογίου, ἀπὸ τὸ 2012 μέχρι τὸ 2017, ἐδημοσιεύοντο τακτικά, μαζὶ μὲ ἄλλα κείμενα τοῦ Κιτσίκη, στὴν ἀθηναϊκὴ ἡμερησία ἐφημερίδα "Ἐλεύθερη Ὥρα" καὶ ἐνεπλουτίζοντο μὲ ἐκτενῆ ἄρθρα, στὸ τριμηνιαῖο περιοδικὸ τοῦ Δημήτρη Κιτσίκη, ποὺ φέρει τὸν ἴδιο τίτλο μὲ τὸ ἱστολόγιο, δηλαδὴ "Ἐνδιάμεση Περιοχή" (http://www.intermediateregion.com), περιοδικὸ τὸ ὁποῖο δημοσιεύεται ἀνελλιπῶς ἀπὸ τὸ 1996.
Ὁ Κιτσίκης ἐδημοσίευε ἐπίσης τακτικά, μακροσκελῆ ἄρθρα, ἀπὸ τὸ 1999 μέχρι τὸ 2017 καὶ τὸν θάνατο τοῦ ἐκδότου του Παύλου Βουδούρη, στὸ ἀθηναϊκὸ μηνιαῖο περιοδικὸ "Τρίτο Μάτι".

Βλέπε καὶ μία συνέντευξη, ἐφ'ὅλης τῆς ὕλης τοῦ Κιτσίκη στὸ lifo.gr



Γιὰ ὅσους διαβάζουν γαλλικά,εἰσέρχεσθε στὸ παρακάτω ἱστολόγιο
γιὰ νὰ διαβάσετε ἄρθρα τοῦ Κιτσίκη

Στὸ παρὸν ἱστολόγιο ἀπαγορεύεται ῥητῶς ἡ ἔκφρασις ἀπὸ τοὺς σχολιαστὲς ἀντικομμουνισμοῦ ἤ ἀντιφασισμοῦ

Ἔλλειψις σεβασμοῦ θεωρεῖται ἀνάρτησις σχολιασμοῦ ὡς ἀνωνύμου ἤ unknown. Ἐσεῖς θὰἀπαντούσατε στὸ τηλέφωνο σὲ κάποιον ποὺ θὰ ἠρνεῖτο νὰ δὠσῃ τὸ ὄνομά του;
Showing posts with label Ἠθική. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ἠθική. Show all posts

Jul 12, 2021

769 - Ἑβραϊκὸς γάμος

 




769 - Ἑβραϊκὸς γάμος

file:///C:/Users/Dimitri/Desktop/Jewish%20marriage.pdf

Jewish wedding is a wedding ceremony that follows Jewish laws and traditions.

While wedding ceremonies vary, common features of a Jewish wedding include a ketubah (marriage contract) which is signed by two witnesses, a chuppah (or huppah; wedding canopy), a ring owned by the groom that is given to the bride under the canopy, and the breaking of a glass.

Technically, the Jewish wedding process has two distinct stages: kiddushin (sanctification or dedication, also called erusinbetrothal in Hebrew) and nissuin (marriage), when the couple start their life together. The first stage prohibits the woman to all other men, requiring a get (religious divorce) to dissolve, and the final stage permits the couple to each other. The ceremony that accomplishes nissuin is known as chuppah.

Today, erusin/kiddushin occurs when the groom gives the bride a ring or other object of value with the intent of creating a marriage. There are differing opinions as to which part of the ceremony constitutes nissuin/chuppah; they include standing under the canopy - itself called a chuppah - and being alone together in a room (yichud). While historically these two events could take place as much as a year apart, they are now commonly combined into one ceremony.

Before the wedding ceremony, the groom agrees to be bound by the terms of the ketubah (marriage contract) in the presence of two witnesses, whereupon the witnesses sign the ketubah. The ketubah details the obligations of the groom to the bride, among which are food, clothing, and marital relations. This document has the standing of a legally binding agreement, though it may be hard to collect these amounts in a secular court. It is often written as an illuminated manuscript that is framed and displayed in their home. Under the chuppah, it is traditional to read the signed ketubah aloud, usually in the Aramaic original, but sometimes in translation. Traditionally, this is done to separate the two basic parts of the wedding. Non-Orthodox Jewish couples may opt for a bilingual ketubah, or for a shortened version to be read out.

A traditional Jewish wedding ceremony takes place under a chuppah (wedding canopy), symbolizing the new home being built by the couple when they become husband and wife.[8][9]

Jewish Wedding, Venice, 1780 Musée d'Art et d'Histoire du Judaïsme

Prior to the ceremony, Ashkenazi Jews have a custom to cover the face of the bride (usually with a veil), and a prayer is often said for her based on the words spoken to Rebecca in Genesis 24:60. The veiling ritual is known in Yiddish as badeken. Various reasons are given for the veil and the ceremony, a commonly accepted reason is that it reminds the Jewish people of how Jacob was tricked by Laban into marrying Leah before Rachel, as her face was covered by her veil (see Vayetze).Another reasoning is that Rebecca is said to have veiled herself when approached by Isaac, who would become her husband. Sephardi Jews do not perform this ceremony. Additionally, the veil emphasizes that the groom is not solely interested in the bride's external beauty, which fades with time; but rather in her inner beauty which she will never lose.

In many Orthodox Jewish communities, the bride is escorted to the chuppah by both mothers, and the groom is escorted by both fathers, known by Ashkenazi Jews as unterfirers (Yiddish: "Ones who lead under"). In another custom, bride and groom are each escorted by their respective parents. However, the escorts may be any happily married couple, if parents are unavailable or undesired for some reason. There is a custom in some Ashkenazi communities for the escorts to hold candles as they process to the chuppah.

Plain gold wedding bands
Outdoor huppa in Vienna
A groom breaking the glass
Dances at a Jewish wedding in Morocco, early 19th century
1893 painting of a marriage procession in a Russian shtetl
by Isaak Asknaziy

In Ashkenazi tradition, the bride traditionally walks around the groom three or seven times when she arrives at the chuppah. This may derive from Jeremiah 31:22, "A woman shall surround a man". The three circuits may represent the three virtues of marriage: righteousness, justice and loving kindness (see Hosea 2:19). Seven circuits derives from the Biblical concept that seven denotes perfection or completeness. Sephardic Jews do not perform this ceremony.

Increasingly, it is common in liberal or progressive Jewish communities (especially ReformReconstructionist, or Humanistic) to modify this custom for the sake of egalitarianism, or for a same-gender couple. One adaptation of this tradition is for the bride to circle the groom three times, then for the groom to circle his bride three times, and then for each to circle each other (as in a do-si-do). The symbolism of the circling has been reinterpreted to signify the centrality of one spouse to the other, or to represent the four imahot (matriarchs) and three avot (patriarchs).

In traditional weddings, two blessings are recited before the betrothal; a blessing over wine, and the betrothal blessing, which is specified in the Talmud. The wine is then tasted by the couple.

Rings are not actually required; they are simply the most common way (since the Middle Ages) of fulfilling the bride price requirement. The bride price (or ring) must have a monetary value no less than a single prutah (the smallest denomination of currency used during the Talmudic era). The low value is to ensure that there are no financial barriers to access marriage.

According to Jewish law, the ring must be composed of solid metal (gold or silver are preferred; alloys are discouraged), with no jewel inlays or gem settings, so that it's easy to ascertain the ring's value. Others ascribe a more symbolic meaning, saying that the ring represents the ideal of purity and honesty in a relationship. However, it's quite common for Jewish couples (especially those who are not Orthodox) to use weddings rings with engraving, metallic embellishments, or to go a step further and use gemstone settings. Some Orthodox couples will use a simple gold or silver band during the ceremony to fulfill the halachic obligations, and after the wedding, the bride may wear a ring with any decoration she likes.

The groom gives the bride a ring, traditionally a plain wedding band, and recites the declaration: Behold, you are consecrated to me with this ring according to the law of Moses and Israel. The groom places the ring on the bride's right index finger. According to traditional Jewish law, two valid witnesses must see him place the ring.

During some egalitarian weddings, the bride will also present a ring to the groom,often with a quote from the Song of Songs: "Ani l'dodi, ve dodi li" (I am my beloved's and my beloved is mine), which may also be inscribed on the ring itself. This ring is sometimes presented outside the chuppah to avoid conflicts with Jewish law

The Sheva Brachot or seven blessings are recited by the hazzan or rabbi, or by select guests who are called up individually. Being called upon to recite one of the seven blessings is considered an honour. The groom is given the cup of wine to drink from after the seven blessings. The bride also drinks the wine. In some traditions, the cup will be held to the lips of the groom by his new father-in-law and to the lips of the bride by her new mother-in-law. Traditions vary as to whether additional songs are sung before the seven blessings.

After the bride has been given the ring, or at the end of the ceremony (depending on local custom), the groom breaks a glass, crushing it with his right foot, and the guests shout: "Mazal Tov!" (Hebrew: "congratulations"). At some contemporary weddings, a lightbulb may be substituted because it is thinner and more easily broken, and it makes a louder popping sound.

The origin of this custom is unknown, although many reasons have been given. The primary reason is that joy must always be tempered. This is based on two accounts in the Talmud of rabbis who, upon seeing that their son's wedding celebration was getting out of hand, broke a vessel – in the second case a glass – to calm things down.Another explanation is that it is a reminder that despite the joy, Jews still mourn the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem. Because of this, some recite the verses "If I forget thee / O Jerusalem..." (Ps. 137:5) at this point. Many other reasons have been given by traditional authorities.

Former Sephardic Chief Rabbi of Israel Ovadia Yosef has strongly criticized the way this custom is sometimes carried out, arguing that "Many unknowledgeable people fill their mouths with laughter during the breaking of the glass, shouting 'mazel tov' and turning a beautiful custom meant to express our sorrow" over Jerusalem's destruction "into an opportunity for lightheadedness."Reform Judaism has a new custom where brides and grooms break the wine glass together.

Yichud (togetherness or seclusion) refers to the Ashkenazi practice of leaving the bride and groom alone for 10–20 minutes after the wedding ceremony. The couple retreats to a private room. Yichud can take place anywhere, from a rabbi's study to a synagogue classroom. The reason for yichud is that according to several authorities, standing under the canopy alone does not constitute chuppah, and seclusion is necessary to complete the wedding ceremony. However, Sephardic Jews do not have this custom, as they consider it a davar mechoar (repugnant thing), compromising the couple's modesty.

In Yemen, the Jewish practice was not for the groom and his bride to be secluded in a canopy (chuppah), as is widely practiced today in Jewish weddings, but rather in a bridal chamber that was, in effect, a highly decorated room in the house of the groom. This room was traditionally decorated with large hanging sheets of colored, patterned cloth, replete with wall cushions and short-length mattresses for reclining. Their marriage is consummated when they have been left together alone in this room. The chuppah is described the same way in Sefer HaIttur (12th century), and similarly in the Jerusalem Talmud.

Dancing is a major feature of Jewish weddings. It is customary for the guests to dance in front of the seated couple and entertain them. Traditional Ashkenazi dances include:The Krenzl, in which the bride's mother is crowned with a wreath of flowers as her daughters dance around her (traditionally at the wedding of the mother's last unwed daughter).The Mizinke, a dance for the parents of the bride or groom when their last child is wed.The Horah, a circle dance. Dancers link arms or hold hands, and move with a grapevine step. In large groups, concentric circles may be formed The gladdening of the bride, in which guests dance around the bride, and can include the use of "shtick"—silly items such as signs, banners, costumes, confetti, and jump ropes made of table napkins.The Mitzvah tantz, in which family members and honored rabbis are invited to dance in front of the bride (or sometimes with the bride in the case of a father or grandfather), often holding a gartel, and then dancing with the groom. At the end the bride and groom dance together themselves. After the meal, Birkat Hamazon (Grace after meals) is recited, followed by sheva brachot. At a wedding banquet, the wording of the blessings preceding Birkat Hamazon is slightly different from the everyday version. Prayer booklets called bentshers may be handed out to guests. After the prayers, the blessing over the wine is recited, with two glasses of wine poured together into a third, symbolising the creation of a new life together.In present times, Jewish rabbinical bodies have developed Jewish prenuptial agreements designed to prevent the husband from withholding a get from his wife, should she want a divorce. Such documents have been developed and widely used in the United States, Israel, the United Kingdom and other places. However, this approach has not been universally accepted, particularly by the Orthodox.Conservative Judaism developed the Lieberman clause in order to prevent husbands from refusing to give their wives a get. To do this, the ketubah has built in provisions; so, if predetermined circumstances occur, the divorce goes into effect immediately.TimingWeddings should not be performed on Shabbat or on Jewish holidays, including Chol HaMoed. The period of the counting of the omer and the three weeks are also prohibited, although customs vary regarding part of these periods. Some months and days are considered more or less auspicious.(Wikipedia)

Δημήτρης Κιτσίκης     12 Ἰουλίου 2021






Jan 8, 2021

670 -Γιατὶ Ἕλλην σημαίνει Σπαρτιάτης



670 -Γιατὶ Ἕλλην σημαίνει Σπαρτιάτης

Πέραν τῶν ἰδεολογιῶν πέρα τοῦ καλοῦ καὶ τοῦ κακοῦ, πέραν τῆς ἠθικῆς, ὁ Ἕλλην ἔχει ἦθος, ἐντιμότητα, δὲν προδίδει, δὲν ὑπογράφει δήλωσι μετανοίας, δὲν κλαψουρίζει, δὲν ὑποπέφτει στὰ δυτικὰ ἀνθρώπινα δικαιώματα δὲν κομματικοποιεῖται, δὲν φανατίζεται, δὲν μισεῖ, ἀγαπᾷ τοὺς γενναίους ἐχθροὺς καὶ φίλους καὶ περιφρονεῖ τοὺς γραικύλους, τοὺς προσκυνημένους καὶ ἀκολουθεῖ τὸ φῶς τοῦ Ἀπόλλωνος ποὺ μετελαμπάδευσε τὴν σκυτάλη στὸν Χριστό. Παρακάτω δεῖγμα σπαριατικῆς πορείας τοῦ Ἕλληνος Δημήτρη Κουφοντῖνα. Μὴ τολμήσῃ κανεὶς νὰ τὸν ἀντικρούσῃ ἐδῶ ἐὰν δὲν ἔχει δώσει ὁ ἴδιος στὴν ζωή του δείγματα σπαρτιατισμοῦ. Δὲν θὰ τὸ ἀνεχθῶ. Δημήτρης Κιτσίκης

Δήλωση ἔναρξης ἀπεργίας πείνας Δ. Κουφοντίνα

 Τὸ ἔγγραφο τοῦ ὑπουργείου  πού μοῦ γνωστοποιήθηκε  χθές, ἀποκαλύπτει τὴν πρωτοφανῆ του μεθόδευση ἀπέναντί μου, καθώς, σύμφωνα μὲ αὐτό, στὴ μιάμιση ὥρα  ποὺ διήρκεσε  ἡ μεταγωγή μου ἀπὸ τὴν Κασσαβέτεια  στὸ Δομοκό,  ὅπου καὶ ὅπως ἀπαιτοῦσε  ἡ ἐγχώρια Φαμίλια,  φαίνεται ὅτι μετάχθηκα καὶ στὸν Κορυδαλλό,  γιὰ νὰ φαίνεται ὅτι  τηρήθηκε  αὐτὸ ποὺ ἀπαιτοῦσε ὁ φωτογραφικὸς νόμος  γιὰ τὶς ἀγροτικές, ποὺ ἔφτιαξαν γιὰ νὰ μὲ ἐκτοπίσουν ἀπὸ αὐτές.

Πλήρης ἐξευτελισμὸς τοῦ κράτους δικαίου, γιὰ τὸ ὁποῖο φλυαροῦν,  πλῆρες κουρέλιασμα τῶν ἴδιων τους τῶν νόμων. Ὅμως, δὲν πρόκειται μόνο γιὰ μεθόδευση ἐξόντωσης  ἑνὸς πολιτικοῦ κρατούμενου. Οὔτε ἁπλὰ γιὰ τὸ χάϊδεμα τῆς πιὸ ἀκροδεξιᾶς της τάσης,  ἀπὸ μιὰ ὁλοένα καὶ πιὸ ἀκροδεξιὰ κυβέρνηση.  Πρόκειται  γιὰ  τὴν προσπάθεια νὰ συντρίψουν  ἕνα πρόσωπο,  ὄχι γι’ αὐτὸ ποὺ εἶναι, ἀλλὰ γιὰ  αὐτὸ  ποὺ σηματοδοτεῖ,  μὲ τὴν ἄρνησή του νὰ ὑποκύψει  στὶς ἀφόρητες πιέσεις ποὺ τὸ σύστημα τοῦ ἀσκεῖ, ὅπως ζητοῦσαν ἐπίμονα καὶ πρόσφατα στὴ Βουλὴ   οἱ ἐκπρόσωποι τῆς οἰκογένειας  καὶ ὁ ἐκλεκτός τῆς Πρεσβείας.

Μετὰ  τά ὅσα ἀπροκάλυπτα  γίνονται  καὶ  ὅσα κυνικὰ ἀποκαλύπτονται  στὸν πόλεμο ἐναντίον μου,  ἡ ἀπεργία πείνας   ἀποτελεῖ πιὰ ζήτημα προσωπικῆς συνέπειας καὶ ἀτομικῆς ἀξιοπρέπειας. 

Ἀφοῦ ἐπιμένουν στὸ νόμο ποὺ  τόσο  προκλητικὰ  μηχανεύτηκαν,  ὀφείλουν νὰ τὸν ἐφαρμόσουν, τουλάχιστον αὐτόν, καὶ  νὰ μὲ ξαναφέρουν  στὸ ὑπόγειο τοῦ Κορυδαλλοῦ,  στὴν εἰδικὴ πτέρυγα ποὺ ἔκτισε  ὁ ἴδιος ὁ  ὑπουργὸς τῆς  καταστολῆς,  ὁ Μ.Χρυσοχοίδης, γιὰ νὰ θάψει τὴν 17Ν, καὶ  ὅπου πέρασα τά 16  ἀπὸ τά 18 χρόνια  ποὺ εἶμαι στὴ φυλακή.

 ΔΗΜΗΤΡΗΣ ΚΟΥΦΟΝΤΙΝΑΣ

Φυλακὲς Δομοκοὺ

8 Ἰανουαρίου 2021

Sep 14, 2018

442 - Ἡ Ἱστορία δικαιώνει τὸν Χίτλερ



442 - Ἡ Ἱστορία δικαιώνει τὸν Χίτλερ

α) Ἡ Ἱστορία δὲν δίδει ὑστεροφημία σὲ στάσεις ἠθικῆς, διότι ἡ ἠθικὴ δὲν εἶναι σταθερὴ ἀξία ἀλλὰ ἐξαρτᾶται ἀπὸ τὴν ἑκάστοτε κοινωνία. Διαφορετικὴ κοινωνία, διαφορετικὴ ἠθική. Χθὲς κατεδικάζετο ὡς ἀνήθικος ὁ γάμος τῶν ὁμοφυλοφίλων. Σήμερα θεωρεῖται ἠθικὴ στάσι διότι βασίζεται στὸν σεβασμὸ τῶν ἀνθρωπίνων δικαιωμάτων. Ἡ ἠθικὴ συνδέεται ἄμεσα μὲ τὴν ὑποκρισία ἐφ’ὅσον συμφέρει τὸν ἄνθρωπο νὰ προσαρμόζεται  στοὺς κανόνες τῆς κοινωνίας. Ὁ ὁ ἱερεὺς Ταρτοῦφος σὲ σκήνη τοῦ Μολιέρου πετᾷ τὸ μαντήλι του ἐπάνω στὰ γυμνὰ στήθη διπλανῆς κυρίας ποὺ ὀρέγεται, λέγοντας: «Καλύψατε αὐτὸ τὸ στῆθος ποὺ ἀδυνατῶ νὰ κοιτάξω!»

Οἱ Ἀγγλοσάξωνες εἰδικά, μέσῳ τοῦ προτεσταντισμοῦ ἔχουν ἐξαπλώσει τὴν ὑποκρισία τῶν ἀνθρωπίνων δικαιωμάτων σὲ ὅλον τὸν πλανήτη. Ὁ Χίτλερ φέρεται νὰ εἶχε εἰπῆ, «ὅταν ἀκούω γιὰ ἀνθρώπινα δικαιώματα τραβάω τὸ πιστόλι μου!» ἐννοῶντας ὅτι δὲν ἄντεχε τὴν ὑποκρισία. Ἡ Ὀρθοδοξία, σὲ ἀντίθεσι μὲ τὰ κοινῶς λεγόμενα, δὲν βασίζεται στὴν ἠθική, ἀλλὰ στὴν πίστι. Καὶ ὁ ἄθεος δύναται νὰ εἶναι ἠθικός.

β) Τὸ ἔγκλημα εἶναι τὸ ψωμοτύρι τῆς Ἱστορίας ἀπὸ τὴν ἐποχὴ τῆς πτώσεως ἀπὸ τὸν Παράδεισο. Συνεπῶς δὲν δύναται νὰ ἀξιολογήσῃ κανεὶς  ἕναν Χίτλερ, ἕναν Στάλιν, ἕναν Μάο, ἤ οἱονδήποτε ἡγέτη δημοκρατικοῦ κράτους ὅπως τοῦ Καναδᾶ, βάσει ἠθικῶν ἀξιῶν, ἐφ’ὅσον ὁ τελευταῖος στέλνει τὰ παιδιά του στὸ Ἀφγανιστὰν νὰ σφάζουν τοὺς γηγενεῖς στὸ ὄνομα τῶν ἀνθρωπίνων δικαιωμάτων. Ὁ ἀριθμὸς τῶν θυμάτων δὲν παίζει ῥόλο στὴν ἀποτίμησι τοῦ μεγέθους τοῦ ἐγκλήματος. Ἄς ποῦμε ὅτι ὁ Χίτλερ ἐθανάτωσε δέκα ἑκατομμύρια, ὁ Στάλιν 20,  ὁ Μάο 60 καὶ οἱ δυτικοὶ ἀποικιοκράτες-ἰμπεριαλιστὲς 400 ἑκατομμύρια: ποιοτικὰ καὶ ὄχι ποσοτικά, ἀπὸ τὴν στιγμὴ ποὺ σφάζῃς ἕναν καὶ μοναδικὸ ἄνθρωπο εἶσαι ἐξ ἴσου ἐγκληματίας.

γ) Τὸ ἦθος καὶ ὄχι ἡ ἠθική, ἔχει μεγαλύτερη ἀξία, διότι εἶναι αἰωνίως συνδεδεμένο μὲ τὸ πρόσωπο καὶ ὄχι μὲ τὴν μεταβάλουσα κοινωνία. Ὁ Σπαρτιάτης εἶχε πρωτίστως ἦθος, αὐτὸ ποὺ οἱ χιτλερικοὶ ὠνόμαζαν τιμὴ καὶ οἱ Ἕλληνες φιλότιμο.

δ) Ἡ Ἱστορία εἶναι ἄδικη στὸ σήμερα μὲ τοὺς δημιουργούς (πολιτικούς, καλλιτέχνες, φιλοσόφους) καὶ πάντα δίκαιη στὸ αὔριο, στὴν μεταθανάτιο ὑστεροφημία. Ὁ μέτριος θὰ γίνη γνωστὸς ὅσο ζῇ καὶ θὰ ξεχασθῇ μετὰ θάνατον, σὲ ἀντίθεσι μὲ τὸν δημιουργό.

ε) Ὁ Χίτλερ ξαναζεῖ σήμερα, περισσότερο ἀπὸ τὸν Στάλιν. Ἡ ἑλληνίδα  φιλόσοφος Σάβιτρι Ντέβι, ὡς μεγαλοφυὴς δημιουργὸς ἀπὸ τὴν Ἰνδία, στὴν ἀνακοίνωσι τοῦ θανάτου τοῦ Χίτλερ, τὸ 1945, διεκήρυξε πὼς ὑπῆρξε ἡ μετενσάρκωσι τοῦ θεοῦ Βίσνου. Ὁ γάλλος μεγαλοφυὴς πολιτικὸς στρατηγὸς ντὲ Γκώλ, στὴν ἀνακοίνωσι τῆς αὐτοκτονίας τοῦ Χίτλερ, τὸν παρωμοίωσε μὲ Ἄτλαντα ποὺ ἔφερε στοὺς ὤμους του τὸν πλανήτη.

στ) Παρὰ τὴν γενικὴ καταδίκη του ὡς τέρατος, ὁ Χίτλερ σήμερα, 73 χρόνια μετὰ τὴν ἐξαφάνισί του, γίνεται κέντρο λατρείας αὐξανομένου ἀριθμοῦ νέων, σὲ ὅλην τὴν Εὐρώπη καὶ τὸν κόσμο. Ἐπιμένω: τῶν νέων καὶ οὐχὶ τῶν νοσταλγῶν τοῦ παρελθόντος. Οἱ δὲ φιλελεύθεροι σοσιαλδημοκράτες ἀστοὶ τῶν Βρυξελλῶν ὑπερθεματίζουν τὴν ἐπαναστατικότητα τοῦ Χίτλερ ὡς κολοσσοῦ, λέγοντας ὅτι δὲν ἐπανεμφανίσθηκε ἀκόμη ἕνας Χίτλερ ἀλλὰ μόνον μερικοὶ μικροὶ Μουσσολίνιδες.

Δημήτρης Κιτσίκης                                             14 Σεπτεμβρίου 2018





May 21, 2018

423 - Ἀνάγκη καὶ Ἐλευθερία


Ὁ Ἐσταυρομένος Διόνυσος-Χριστός




Ἀπὸ τὸν ἐξωγήϊνο Ἕλληνα στὸν Γραικύλο κατὰ Χάρρυ Κλύνν


423 - Ἀνάγκη καὶ Ἐλευθερία

Ἀνάγκη καὶ ἐλευθερία εἶναι δύο ἔννοιες μεταφυσικὲς ποὺ προσδιορίζουν τὸν ἑλληνισμό διαχρονικὰ μὲ μεταίχμιο τὴν γέννησι τοῦ Χριστοῦ. Πρὸ Χριστοῦ ἡ Ἀνάγκη, μετὰ Χριστὸν ἡ Ἐλευθερία.

Ὁ πρὸ Χριστοῦ Ἕλλην ἦταν ἐγκλωβισμένος στὴν φυλακὴ τῆς Ἀνάγκης. Ἐξέφραζε τὴν κατάστασί του αὐτὴ μέσῳ τῆς ἀρχαίας τραγωδίας. Οἱ Ἕλληνες, ἐρχόμενοι ἀπὸ τὸ Διάστημα, ὡς ἐξωγήϊνοι ποὺ ἦσαν, εἶχαν προσγειωθῆ στὸ διαστημοδρόμειο τοῦ Ὀλύμπου καὶ τὸ θεϊκό τους DNA εἶχε μεταφερθῆ στοὺς γύρω κάμπους ὅπου ἔζουν πυγμαῖοι καὶ παρὰ τὶς συνεχεῖς αἱμομιξίες μὲ τοὺς θνητοὺς τοῦ κάμπου, μέχρι σήμερα ὑπερισχύει τὸ ἰδικό τους DNA. Διὰ τοῦτο καὶ ὁ Ἕλλην, μεταμορφωμένος συνεχῶς,  εἶναι ἀθάνατος.

Μὴ γνωρίζοντας τὴν ἐξωγήϊνη προέλευσι τῶν Ἑλλήνων, οἱ πυγμαῖοι τοῦ κάμπου, τοὺς ἀπεκάλεσαν θεούς, τοὺς δώδεκα θεοὺς τοὺ Ὀλύμπου. Ὑποταγμένοι σὲ αὐτοὺς προσεπάθησαν, μέσῳ τοῦ Προμηθέως νὰ ἀπελευθερωθοῦν ἀπὸ αὐτούς, ἀλλὰ ματαίως. Ἡ Ἀνάγκη τοὺς ἐκράτει καθηλωμένους. Οἱ κραυγές των ἀπελπισίας ἐγέμιζαν τὰ θέατρά τους. «Γιατί τόσο ἀνεξήγητο αἷμα; Γιατὶ τόση τραγωδία;»

Εἶχε ἔλθει ἕνας ἄλλος θεὸς ἐξ  Ἀνατολῶν, ἀπὸ τὴν Ἰνδία, ποὺ ἀρχαῖοι γεωγράφοι ἀπεκάλουν «Νέα Ἑλλάς», ὁ Δίας τῆς Νύσσης, ὁ Διόνυσος, θεὸς τοῦ ἔρωτος. Ὁ Διόνυσος, ἀπὸ τὴν  ἑλληνικὴ μυθολογία μετεπήδησε στὸ Ἰσραὴλ ὡς Χριστός, ὁ ὁποῖος μετουσίωσε τὸν ἔρωτα σὲ ἀγάπη. Ὁ ἔρως τοῦ Διονύσου ἐξεφράζετο στὸ ἀρχαῖο θέατρο ὡς τραγωδία τῆς Ἀνάγκης. Ὁ Χριστός, ὡς ἕλλην Διόνυσος ἀναβιβάζοντας τὸν ἔρωτα σὲ ἀγάπη μετουσίωσε τὴν ἀνάγκη σὲ ἐλευθερία, δίδοντας στὸν ἄνθρωπο τὸ αὐτεξούσιο, δηλαδὴ τὴν δυνατότητα νὰ ἐπιλέξῃ μεταξὺ τοῦ κακοῦ καὶ τοῦ καλοῦ, ἱδρύοντας τὴν Νέα Ἱερουσαλήμ.

Ἰδοὺ ἡ ταύτησις ἀλλὰ καὶ τὸ ξεπέρασμα τοῦ διονυσιακοῦ ἔρωτος ἀπὸ τὴν χριστιανικὴ ἀγάπη, ἑνὸς ἀποκλειστικοῦ ἑλληνικοῦ ἐγχειρήματος, ἔτσι ὅπως περιγράφεται ἀπὸ τοὺς ξένους:
Φύσις καὶ κοινωνία εἶναι ἑλληνικὲς ἔννοιες. Ἡ φύσις βασίζεται στὴν ἀνισότητα καὶ τὴν διαφορετικότητα.Ὑπάρχουν ἀνώτερα πλάσματα καὶ κατώτερα πλάσματα. Ὁμοιομορφία ὅμως δὲν ὑπάρχει. Ἡ διαφορετικότητα εἶναι παντοῦ. Ἡ κοινωνία, ὡς τεχνητὸ κατασκεύασμα τοῦ ζωϊκοῦ βασιλείου βασίζεται σὲ κανόνες ποὺ ἐπινόησαν ζῶα καὶ ἄνθρωποι γιὰ νὰ ζοῦν ἐν ὁμονοίᾳ.

Οἱ σημερινὲς ἀνθρώπινες κοινωνίες ἐπινόησαν τὴν ἠθικὴ ποὺ διαφέρει σὲ κάθε διαφορετικὴ κοινωνία. Συχνά, οἱ ἠθικοὶ κανόνες ἀντιστρατεύονται τοὺς νόμους τῆς φύσεως. Ὑποστηρίζουν τὴν ἰσότητα καὶ τὴν ὁμοιομορφία.  Ἀποφασίζουν καὶ ἐπιβάλλουν κατὰ τὸ δοκοῦν σχέσεις μεταξὺ τῶν ἀτόμων ποὺ δὲν ὑπάρχουν στὴν φύσι. Ἡ θρησκεία, ὡς κατασκεύασμα τῆς ἀνθρωπίνης κοινωνίας ἐπιβάλλει κανόνες ἠθικῆς ποὺ συχνὰ ἀντιστρατεύονται τὴν φύσι. Γιὰ τὸν λόγο αὐτό ἡ Ὀρθοδοξία δὲν βασίζεται στὴν ἠθικὴ ἀλλὰ στὴν πίστι καὶ μόνο.

Στὸ ἐπίπεδο τῶν τριῶν ἰδεολογιῶν, κομμουνισμός, φιλελευθερισμός, φασισμός, οἱ δύο πρῶτες βασίζονται στὸν μῦθο τῆς ἰσότητος μεταξὺ φύλων καὶ φυλῶν, στὰ ἀνθρώπινα δικαιώματα ἤ τὴν ἰσότητα ἐντὸς μίας κοινωνικῆς τάξεως. Μόνον ὁ φασισμὸς εἶναι κοντὰ στὴν φύσι, ἐφ’ὅσον ἀποδέχεται  τὴν ἀνισότητα καὶ τὴν διαφορετικότητα.

Ὅσο γιὰ τὴν Ἐλευθερία, καμμία ἐκ τῶν τριῶν ἰδεολογιῶν δὲν ξεφεύγει ἀπὸ τὴν Ἀνάγκη καὶ δὲν τὴν ἐξασφαλίζει. Ἐλευθερία δίνει μόνον ἡ πίστις στὸν Χριστὸ διὰ τῆς Ὀρθοδοξίας καὶ καμμία θρησκεία, ἰδίως ὄχι τὸ Ἰσλάμ.

Δημήτρης Κιτσίκης                                                                     21 Μαΐου 2018


Τὸ κλασσικὸ χαρρυκλυννικὸ ἔργο καταδικασμοῦ τοῦ γραικυλισμοῦ